arXiv submission limits explained: monthly quotas, On Hold, and a LaTeX checklist
arXiv allows each submitter up to two new submissions per calendar month, with no more than three active submissions at once. You need room under both limits. A paper carried over as On Hold uses an active slot, even though it does not use a new monthly slot.
The monthly policy took effect on October 1, 2026. On November 11, Times Higher Education reported that an unpublished analysis by Jonathan Gillham put October submissions at 42,152. That is a third-party estimate cited by the publication, not a new arXiv policy announcement. For authors preparing a manuscript, the useful question is how the existing rules affect the next submission.
Two limits you need to check
The official announcement and FAQ explain who is counted and how holds carry over. The current moderation policy specifies new submissions and separately addresses replacements. Policy checked November 11, 2026.
| Limit | What it controls | What to check |
|---|---|---|
| Two new submissions per calendar month | New submissions by the submitter across all categories | How many new papers you have submitted in the named month |
| Three active submissions at once | Papers still active, including On Hold papers from earlier months | Your current submission queue |
A calendar month is a named month, such as November, rather than a rolling 30-day window. Changing categories does not create another allowance. The official announcement says the three-active limit has been in place since 2024; the two-per-month update began in October 2026. arXiv may ask an individual author to limit their rate further.
Rejections, co-authors and deleting a submission
| Situation | Effect under the official FAQ |
|---|---|
| A new paper is rejected | It still counts toward that month's two submissions |
| Two papers are submitted in different categories | Both count toward the same monthly limit |
| You are a co-author, but someone else submits | It counts toward the submitter's rate, not yours |
| A submitted paper is deleted before announcement | It counts toward neither the monthly nor active limit |
| A paper remains On Hold into the next month | It uses an active slot, not a slot from the new month's allowance |
Coordinate the submission owner with your co-authors before uploading. Multiple co-authorships alone do not establish that someone is evading a limit. Deleting a pre-announcement submission is also different from withdrawing a paper that is already public; the latter belongs to arXiv's permanent-record policies.
A worked example: two October holds in November
Suppose you submit paper A on October 20 and paper B on October 27. Both remain On Hold on November 3.
- At the start of this example, you have used none of November's two new-submission slots, but two of the three active slots are occupied.
- On November 3, you submit paper C. November usage becomes 1 of 2, and active usage becomes 3 of 3.
- You cannot add paper D while all three remain active. If A is announced on November 6 and leaves the active queue, you can submit D, provided no other restriction applies. November usage then becomes 2 of 2.
Illustrative timeline: after adding C, one November slot remains, but all three active slots are occupied. Dates in the example are hypothetical.
Check the status shown in your account before planning around a deadline. This example illustrates capacity, not a promised moderation schedule. arXiv's moderation is not peer review, and a successful compilation does not guarantee announcement.
Do new versions use the same allowance?
The current moderation page states the monthly limit for new submissions. Replacements of an existing article have their own rule: after version 5, replacements are limited to one per week. The replacement guide also asks authors generally to replace no more than once per week.
Use the Replace workflow for a revision of an announced paper and describe the changes in Comments. Do not create another new-paper record merely to update the same work. For an unannounced submission that needs editing, follow arXiv's Unsubmit and Update instructions; do not assume that unsubmit, delete and withdrawal have identical effects on quotas. If your account shows an unexpected restriction, check with arXiv support rather than inferring a reset time from your local clock.
Prepare the LaTeX package before submitting
The following are practical preparation steps based on the current TeX submission guide, separate from the quota rules.
Preparation workflow: assemble the files, rebuild the manuscript, then inspect arXiv's own PDF. The diagram is not a screenshot of the submission system.
Main file, engine and dependencies
- Identify the main
.texfile and include all referenced chapters and appendices. arXiv compiles from the submission root even if the main file is in a subdirectory, so check relative paths. - Match the processor to your source. The TeX Live page currently lists TeX Live 2025 as default, with 2023 also available, and includes pdfLaTeX and XeLaTeX among supported processors. Check the current selection when uploading.
- Include custom
.cls,.styand.bstdependencies that the project needs and arXiv does not supply. Avoid copying an entire TeX installation or unrelated template examples. - Include each referenced figure. For a pdfLaTeX workflow, prepare compatible PDF, PNG or JPEG files ahead of time instead of relying on automatic EPS conversion during submission.
References: a .bbl is no longer always required
arXiv supports processing .bib files with BibTeX and supported biblatex backends. If no .bbl is supplied, include every required .bib; the system can detect the bibliography workflow. If you supply a prebuilt .bbl, arXiv uses it, and its basename must match the main file: main.tex with main.bbl.
For biblatex, the .bbl must match the backend and the biblatex/Biber versions used on arXiv. A stale .bbl can therefore preserve old references or fail even when the .bib is correct. If you use indexes or glossaries, supply the required processed .ind, .gls or .nls files as described in the official guide. See our BibTeX and biblatex guide for the underlying workflow.
A small package you can reproduce
This example uses the article class, pdfLaTeX and BibTeX with the standard plain bibliography style. It requires no extra packages or figures. Save both files in one directory. The book entry is an example reference, not a claim about arXiv policy.
main.tex
\documentclass{article}\begin{document}\section{Introduction}This sample cites a LaTeX reference~\cite{lamport1994}.\bibliographystyle{plain}\bibliography{refs}\end{document}refs.bib
@book{lamport1994, author = {Leslie Lamport}, title = {{LaTeX}: A Document Preparation System}, edition = {2}, publisher = {Addison-Wesley}, year = {1994}}Run the commands from that directory with a TeX installation that provides pdflatex and bibtex:
pdflatex main.texbibtex mainpdflatex main.texpdflatex main.texThe PDF should contain a numbered citation and a reference to Lamport's book. The final log should have no undefined citations. This example was compiled and checked; your full manuscript still needs its own build and arXiv preview. To use the .bbl route, keep the generated main.bbl paired with main.tex.
Final check before you confirm
Unpack your planned upload into a clean directory and rebuild it. Confirm that it does not rely on files outside the archive. Remove unused figures, backups, logs and temporary output; keep the bibliography and index products needed by your chosen workflow. Check hidden-file dependencies, since arXiv deletes hidden files on announcement.
In the PDF generated by arXiv, inspect the title and authors, all figures, bibliography, cross-references and links. Check the source processing log if anything differs. The platform requires viewing this PDF before completing submission. Our compilation troubleshooting guide can help with TeX errors; account quotas and moderation questions belong with arXiv support.
If you prepare your manuscript in EasyLaTeX, use the same main-file and bibliography checklist for the source package you take to arXiv. Keep the final decision tied to arXiv's current requirements and generated preview.